Skip to Main Content
Our Commitment to Diversity

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE

H. W. Turner

US v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp. 366 F.3d 164 (3rd Cir. 2004). Environmental Law - Clean Water Act.

Moody v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc., 85 B.R. 319, 1988 WL 27780 (W.D. Pa. 1988). Bankruptcy.

Wittekamp v. Gulf & Western, Inc., 788 F. Supp. 246 (W.D. Pa. 1992). Misrepresentation.

Rearick v. Holstein-Friesian Ass’n of America, 472 F. Supp. 464 (W.D. Pa. 1979). Sherman Act.

Treibacher Industrie, A.G. v. Allegheny Technologies, Inc., 464 F.3d 1235 (11th Cir. 2006), 2006 WL 2595225. Commercial Law - Sales.

Hart-Carter Co. v. J.P. Burroughs & Son, Inc., 654 F. Supp. 23 (E.D. Mich., S. Div. 1986). Corporations.

Pendrell v. Chatham College, 370 F. Supp. 494 (W.D. Pa. 1974). Civil Rights.

Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc., 483 U.S. 143 (1987). RICO Statute of Limitations.

Sampson-Miller Associated Companies v. Washington Homes, Inc., 303 F. Supp. 739 (W.D. Pa. 1969). Jurisdiction.

In re Browarsky’s Estate, 437 Pa. 282, 263 A.2d 365 (1970). Estates - Attorneys’ Fees.

Baltimore Bank for Cooperatives v. Farmers Cheese Cooperatives, 428 F. Supp. 635 (W.D. Pa. 1977). Creditor’s Rights.

Moody v. Simmons, 858 F.2d 137 (3rd Cir. 1988). Mandamus.

Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc. v. Crown Life Ins. Co., 792 F.2d 341 (3rd Cir. 1986). RICO Statute of Limitations.
FMC Corp. v. Holliday, 885 F.2d 79 (3rd Cir. 1989). ERISA Preemption.
Dow Chemical Co. v. Nova Chemicals Corp. (Canada), 726 F.Supp.2d 459 (D. Del. 2010). Patent Standing.
Dow Chemical Co. v. Nova Chemicals Corp. (Canada), 2010 WL 3083023 (D. Del. 2010). Patent Injunction.
Dow Chemical Co. v. Nova Chemicals Corp. (Canada), 458 Fed.Appx. 910 (Fed. Cir. 2012). Patent Standing.

Represented a chemicals manufacturer as plaintiff in a patent-related petition for certiorari to the US Supreme Court.

Represented a chemicals manufacturer as plaintiff in a patent-related petition for certiorari to the US Supreme Court.

GTE Sylvania Inc. v. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 404 F. Supp. 352 (D. Del. 1975). Consumer Product Safety Act.

In re Browarsky’s Estate Appeal of Mellon National Bank & Trust Co., 428 Pa. 588, 236 A.2d 522 (1968). Estates and Trusts.

Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc. v. Crown Life Ins. Co., 734 F.2d 133 (3rd. Cir. 1984). Sherman Act.

In re Browarsky’s Estate, 43 Pa. D. & C.2d 571 (O.C. Allegh. Co. 1967). Estates.

Ellwood City Forge Company, et al. v. Bohler-Uddeholm America, Inc. (U.S. Sup. 2001). Petition for Certiorari. Federal Rule of Evidence 807.

In re Fritz’ Estate, 52 Pa. D. & C.2d 483 (O.C., Lawrence Co., 1970). Estates.

Fenton v. Stear, 423 F. Supp. 767 (W.D. Pa. 1976). Civil Rights.

GTE Sylvania Inc. v. Consumer Products Safety Commission, 438 F. Supp. 208 (D. Del. 1977). Consumer Product Safety Act.

Haas v. Pittsburgh Nat. Bank, 77 F.R.D. 382 (W.D. Pa. 1977). Class Action Guardian ad litem.

GTE Sylvania Inc. v. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 443 F. Supp. 1152 (D. Del. 1977). Consumer Product Safety Act.

Haas v. Pittsburgh Nat. Bank, 82 F.R.D. 457 (W.D. Pa. 1979). Recusal.

Haas v. Pittsburgh Nat. Bank, 495 F. Supp. 815 (W.D. Pa. 1980). Class Action.

Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. United Transp. Union, 446 F. Supp. 1085 (W.D. Pa. 1978). Railway Adjustment Boards.

Norfolk and W. Ry. Co. v. United Transp. Union, 490 F. Supp. 301 (W.D. Pa. 1980). Interstate Commerce Act.

Lessard v. Jersey Shore State Bank, 702 F. Supp. 96 (M.D. Pa. 1988). Securities Law.

Wood & Locker, Inc. v. Doran and Associates, 708 F. Supp. 684 (W.D. Pa. 1989). Oil and Gas.

Lorenz v. CSX Corp., 736 F. Supp. 650 (W.D. Pa. 1990). Railway Debentures.

Weilersbacher v. Pittsburgh Brewing Co., 421 Pa. 118, 218 A.2d 806 (1966). Contracts.

Palmieri v. Penn Hills Tp., 428 Pa. 464, 239 A.2d 204 (1968). Cable Television - Injunctions.

Bidwell v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Pittsburgh, 4 Pa.Cmwlth. 327, 286 A.2d 471 (1972). Zoning Law.

Com., Dept. of Environmental Resources v. Mill Service, Inc., 21 Pa.Cmwlth. 642, 347 A.2d 503 (1975). Clean Streams Act.

Abd v. Mill Service, Inc., 241 Pa.Super 525, 358 A.2d 86 (1976). Corporations.

Equibank, N.A. v. Pittsburgh National Bank, 243 Pa.Super. 611, 364 A.2d 957 (1976), Estates and Trusts.

Com. v. Bodamer, 40 Pa.Cmwlth. 524, 397 A.2d 871 (1979). Prisons.

Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 489 Pa. 109, 413 A.2d 1037 (1980). Locomotive Equipment - Preemption.

Pennsylvania Public Utility Com’n v. Norfolk and Western Ry. Co., 75 Pa. Cmwlth 420, 461 A.2d 1353 (1983). Public Utility Law - Locomotive Appurtenances - Boiler Inspection Act.

In re Adoption of B.G.S., 614 A.2d 1161 (1992). Parental Rights Termination.

Knuth v. Erie-Crawford Dairy Co-op. Ass’n., 395 F.2d 420 (3rd Cir. 1968). Antitrust.

Hayes v. Sealtest Foods Division of Nat. Dairy Products Corp., 396 F.2d 448 (3rd Cir. 1968). Sherman Act.

Angelo v. Bacharach Instrument Co., 555 F.2d 1164 (3rd Cir. 1977). Equal Pay.

St. John’s General Hosp. of Allegheny-ADR Center v. N.L.R.B., 825 F.2d 740 (3rd Cir. 1987), 125 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3463. Labor Law.

GTE Sylvania, Inc. v. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 598 F.2d 790 (3rd Cir. 1979). Consumer Product - FOIA.

Haas v. Pittsburgh Nat. Bank, 627 F.2d. 677 (3rd Cir. 1980). Class Actions - Recusal.

Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Triangle Industries, Inc., 957 F.2d 1153 (4th Cir. 1992). Insurance Coverage.

Lorenz v. CSX Corp., 1 F.3d 1406 (3rd Cir. 1993). Securities Law.

Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, et al., 447 U.S. 102 (1980), FOIA/CPSA.

Woosley v. Smith, et al., (U.S. Sup. 1999). Opposition to Certiorari - Termination of Parental Rights.

Equibank v. Lash, U.S. Sup. (1992). Petition for Certiorari - ERISA Preemption.

Return to top of page

Email Disclaimer

We welcome your email, but please understand that if you are not already a client of K&L Gates LLP, we cannot represent you until we confirm that doing so would not create a conflict of interest and is otherwise consistent with the policies of our firm. Accordingly, please do not include any confidential information until we verify that the firm is in a position to represent you and our engagement is confirmed in a letter. Prior to that time, there is no assurance that information you send us will be maintained as confidential. Thank you for your consideration.

Accept Cancel